Photography Is a Thinking Practice
(Not a Technical One)
Most photographers are taught to solve problems.
How to expose correctly.
How to balance light.
How to make an image work.
This is useful. It’s also incomplete.
Because at a certain point, photography stops responding to solutions. What it asks for instead is judgment.
That shift is subtle, and many photographers miss it.
Technique Answers Questions Quickly
Technical problems are cooperative.
They reward attention, repetition, and obedience. If you follow instructions, results improve. Cameras are designed that way. They confirm when you’re “doing it right.”
This is why progress early on often feels clear. You learn something new. You apply it. The feedback loop is immediate.
But technical fluency has a ceiling.
Once you know how to make an image function, technique no longer tells you whether the image matters.
Judgment Is Slower, Quieter Work
Judgment doesn’t announce itself.
It doesn’t come with checklists or confirmation. It develops slowly, through comparison, doubt, and accumulated experience. Often, it shows up first as discomfort.
You sense that something isn’t right, but you can’t explain why. You return to certain images without knowing what draws you back. You hesitate before releasing work, not out of fear, but uncertainty.
This isn’t a lack of skill.
It’s the beginning of thinking.
Why Advice Stops Working
At this stage, advice starts to feel less helpful.
The same suggestions that once unlocked progress now feel generic. Tutorials no longer answer the questions you’re asking. Feedback becomes contradictory, depending on who you talk to.
This is because the problem has changed.
The issue is no longer how to make photographs.
It’s how to decide which photographs deserve to exist, and why.
No amount of technical input can make that decision for you.
Thinking Is Not Overthinking
Many photographers become uneasy around this point.
They worry they’re thinking too much. They tell themselves to stop analyzing and just shoot. They associate thinking with paralysis.
But thinking, in this context, isn’t intellectualizing. It’s attention.
It’s noticing patterns in your work.
Recognizing what you repeat unconsciously.
Understanding what you return to when no one is watching.
This kind of thinking doesn’t slow the work down. It gives it direction.
The Difference Between Making Images and Making Work
There’s a difference between producing images and building a body of work.
Images can exist in isolation. Work accumulates.
Work carries memory. Decisions echo forward. Each photograph changes how the next one is made. Over time, something coherent begins to take shape.
That coherence doesn’t come from technique.
It comes from judgment exercised consistently.
This is why some photographers seem to move forward slowly, yet arrive somewhere unmistakable.
Why This Feels Uncomfortable
Thinking exposes uncertainty.
It forces you to sit with questions that don’t resolve quickly. It removes the comfort of external approval. You begin to rely more on your own sense of rightness, even when it isn’t fully formed.
That can feel destabilizing, especially for photographers who have been successful within technical or institutional systems.
But this discomfort is not a sign that something is wrong. It’s a sign that authorship is beginning to matter.
Learning How to Decide
Photography, at its core, is a series of decisions.
Where to stand.
When to press the shutter.
What to include, what to exclude.
What to adjust for.
When to stop shooting.
What to keep.
What to let go.
Technique supports those decisions.
It doesn’t replace them.
Learning how to decide is slower than learning how to shoot. It can’t be rushed. And it rarely develops through information alone.
Continue Reading
Finding Your Photographic Voice Takes Longer Than You Think >
A Quiet Continuation
Much of my work with photographers begins when technical questions fade and different ones take their place.
Questions about choice.
About coherence.
About what their photographs are actually pointing toward.
This is the thinking I continue through private, one-on-one coaching, where images are examined not for how they work, but for what they reveal over time.